The White Male Oppressor Speaks

Here we go again. It has been all over the Communist News Network or CNN, the All Barack Channel News or ABC News, and now the NAACP has jumped on the band wagon by complaining about made up imaginary racial slurs and salivatory attacks that were supposedly levied upon members of Congress by the Tea Party Protesters at the signing of the health-care bill.

I have spent a few hours now looking for audio or video backing up these claims that the progressive media, the “its not hateful if we do it” activist group NAACP,  along with a number of other whiny victim groups and congressional members are claiming happened. The problem is I can’t seem to find any video or audio of these supposed racial slurs. I find this odd because the mainstream media outlets (who as we all know are completely reliable) were there in force, along with a number of liberal bloggers making their usual “try to find anything to use against the tea party people” rounds.

Here is one video that some have been citing as proof of these allegations. I have watched it several times and listened very carefully for these so called racial epithets as the Congressional Black Caucus entered the building.  I can’t seem to find one racially motivated comment or spittle assault, but judge for yourself.

I find it interesting that claims of hateful speech are being levied against these protesters without concrete proof other than the word of members of congress that have an invested interest in discrediting the American people for their own gain. All this while they stand on the floor of congress calling these people Tea Baggers. By now if you have not heard that term you have been living in a cave.

Calling someone a tea bagger is hateful speech. Why is it hateful? For those that are unfamiliar with what the term actually means. Tea Bagging is when one person either lies down or tilts their head back while someone else lowers their testicles into the first persons mouth. So these progressive simps cry hate speech while in the next breath are calling anyone that doesn’t agree with their socialist policies ball lickers.

And of course I have not forgotten about the NAACP, which seems to pride itself on its “we are victims and deserve special treatment” attitude. The NAACP has a cute little double standard petition on their site that states the following “I am taking a stand for civility. There is no place in our political discourse for the abusive, derogatory and racist language used against Representatives Emanuel Cleaver, John Lewis and Barney Frank. This sort of language degrades us all and undermines our democratic process.” Great since you feel so strongly about taking a stand for civility. Why not make another petition for the cessation of derogatory remarks made by you and the members of congress that you support against those that disagree with your position.

The tragedy here is that people just buy whatever these idiots say without presenting any proof.  The double standards from all sides are damn infuriating, but expected from activist groups. But for the members of congress that were elected to office by the same people that they are insulting by calling them racist un-American tea baggers while they try to say they are taking the moral highroad is a joke at best.

Bookmark It

Here is a real head scratcher for you, my loyal reader. Apparently the NAACP (National Association  for the Advancement of Colored People) is taking an very hard stand on something that they say has a “devastating impact on African American and Hispanic communities.” What is this travesty? Quite simply they are whining about the sentencing guidelines being unfair between powder and crack cocaine. (I will pause for the laughter)

The problem they have is apparently not that the black and Hispanic community in some areas, have a problem with crack cocaine addiction, it is that there is a 100 to 1 difference in the sentencing guidelines for possession of the drugs. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the sentencing: A person must possess 500 grams of powder cocaine before they are subject to the same mandatory 5-year prison sentence as an individual convicted of possessing just 5 grams of crack cocaine.

Here is the beauty in their “action” item, they use this wording “In the weeks ahead the U.S. Senate will consider a bill to eliminate this glaring—and racially dubious—injustice.” I love that “racially dubious.” Are you kidding me? This is about one of the most retarded complaints I have seen in a long time.

This is absolutely rich, rather than putting forth an action item to combat crack cocaine abuse in the black community through education and information (which has proven to be affective) they are going to complain about how long the jail sentence is? And then to call it racially dubious like the law was passed and only affects blacks and Hispanics. That is ridiculous! The sentencing is just as harsh for White, Asian, or any other racial group that is caught with the drug. That alone negates their argument and portrayal of yet another imaginary racial bias.

Also, I am sure that the sentencing guidelines are purely to pick on the melanin sufficient and has nothing to do with the epidemic usage of crack cocaine  in the mid 80’s through the early 90’s, similar to the sentencing guidelines for Meth which are much higher than Marijuana. I will bet they will say that is racially motivated too.

Instead of complaining about the sentencing why don’t you take a real stand and start more education and drug abuse prevention programs in the communities with the highest addiction rates rather than focusing on jail sentences and I will bet you will have a higher success rate by having less addicts and this will not be so much of a “problem” anymore. But then you would have to take personal responsibility rather than pretending to be an undeserved victim. And that might hurt donations.

Bookmark It

Well the NAACP in a” we are just poor victims” style official statement on the New Haven firefighters supreme court ruling that those with the highest test scores get promoted even if they are not black. The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored Persons) released a statement that in my opinion comes across as saying nothings valid unless we are completely represented even if we did not earn it. This press release said  things like “This decision is a step backward for equal opportunity in employment.” So let me see if I get what the complaint is. Because only white guys and one Hispanic guy got the highest scores on the test that is for a supervisory position in a profession where supervisors make decisions to put people’s lives on the line, that they should promote people with lesser test scores to those positions because they are black.

We as a society should definitely promote people purely based on color not intelligence or ability to do the job. Because without Affirmative Action, in today’s world we would only have the most skilled and best qualified applicants getting jobs. (insert exasperated sigh) Now this is not to say that Affirmative Action at one time did not have a place and useful purpose, but what it has done (in my opinion) over the years is forced Companies and municipalities to meet quotas no matter the qualifications, so much for the best and brightest,  so that those that work hard and study for advancement are passed over for the underachiever based on skin color or gender or some other supposed “protected class status.” If those at the back of the pack which are generally there for a reason no matter their skin color don’t get promoted above their abilities then someones going to pay a fine.

While the NAACP does lobby for and back some important issues such as the recent victory for keeping intact section 5 of the voting rights act, I found after visiting their website (link at bottom), that they whine, piss and moan a lot when some other ethnicity gets consideration for accomplishments because they were outside the scope of the black community.

That’s just the start of it. The NAACP releases an annual report for their members and the black community telling them which companies to buy from based on 5 categories:

(1) Employment, which includes workforce diversity, recruitment efforts, and employment benefits.

(2) Marketing/ communications expenditures.

(3) Supplier diversity.

(4) Charitable giving/philanthropic activity.

(5) Community Reinvestment.

This to me basically says do not buy from companies that don’t hire, market, buy from, or give money to enough black people and causes. (Yeah that does great things in a slumping economy.) Okay fine, lets apply this logic to other races. So Hispanics don’t buy produce from orchards or farms that don’t employ enough Hispanics. Or white people don’t by mayonnaise because the companies won’t promote or hire you because you don’t have enough melanin in your skin.

This is ridiculous, but apparently poverty pimping is very profitable by making people think they are not getting a fair shake from everybody except their individual ethnic group. Profitability is a huge motivator to continue to push distrust and hard feelings between the different ethnic groups and put a pretty face on racism. Because guess what black people racism doesn’t only go in one direction. The only way that there will ever be any resemblance to ethnic equality is if people stop listening to special interest groups like the NAACP. Don’t worry I will be picking on the other ethnocentric groups out there soon enough including ones that say they are for the betterment of the white community but like the NAACP, CAIR, LA RAZA and others do nothing more than spread hate and distrust among people by using a perceived victim mentality.

Just for the record yes I am white and no I will not apologize for that. but I have never gotten any special consideration because of my lack of melanin. I have had to work my ass off to get ahead in this world and nothing has been handed to me because I am white. So I am a little indignant when I hear people whine and moan that they can’t get ahead because of their race or use actions from 300 years ago to claim discrimination. I do not apologize for any of it, because unlike what I am told all the time from the media and bull shit sitcoms, none of it is my fault so I don’t owe anyone a damn thing except the respect that they earn through dedication and hard work.

Bookmark It