The White Male Oppressor Speaks

I have now officially had enough of the left wing politically correct bullshit and the right wing whining. Let’s just put the whole race issue to bed as a society. But how you may ask? The answer is simple, with both the left and the right playing the victim everyday the solution is… Every damn person in America apparently is a racist! Yes that’s right you are a racist. I am apparently a racist, I get called one regularly because I speak out about whiny ethnic activist groups and support the Arizona law and find a large number of the President’s policies nauseating. So let’s all just collectively say: “fine I am a racist can we move on now?”.

Most recently I was asked by a left winger what I thought of the Arizona law and I replied, “If the federal government won’t enforce the law then I guess the states have to.” I was called a racist for that. Okay fine, I’ll be a racist for supporting the Arizona law, even though I always thought that Mexican was a nationality not a race. And my support for the law has nothing to do with skin color, but the leftists love the word racist so much that I couldn’t ruin their day by letting them know that calling me a racist means absolutely nothing to me. Because as I have said in the past the word has been so over used that it doesn’t mean anything anymore.

Speaking of racism if you listen to the whiny ethnic activists, only white people can be racist. Well all of you who think that are horribly misled and if you are white and think that you are just an oversensitive cry baby with an unnecessary level of imagined “white” guilt.

Recently in the main stream media or as I like to call it Entertainment Tonight on crack, we have seen several stories of supposed racism and actual racism. The first is from a real racist, that racist comes to us from the New Black Panther Party saying how to be free you need to kill white babies. And on the other hand we have an example of our wonderful colorblind society causing harm to somebodies life.

Imagine if you will, a white person had gotten on television and said the only way to be free is to kill some coloreds and may have to kill some of their colored babies. The leftist self hating machine would have that person strung up and skinned in the public square and rightly so. Why should it be any different for any other ethnicity. I ask you in all seriousness why do these people get a pass? Is it because they have a higher melanin content? Or is it because in America today you are evil if you are white? This crap needs to stop racism is racism. I don’t give a damn if 200 years ago your great great great great great grandparents were slaves. Yes it was a horrible time for those people but guess what there is not one white person or black person (yes they owned slaves too, look it up) who’s fault that is. So quit with the victim BS and blame. Stop pointing your finger at everyone else and point it at the only person who’s fault it is that you aren’t getting ahead – You!

I read that the lady who unjustly lost her job because of an excerpted video of her speech at the NAACP dinner where she was describing an important learning experience in her life is suing Andrew Brieghtbart (probably not how you spell his name but I don’t find him credible or interesting enough to double check.) over this whole mess. Boy do I hope she wins. On that same token I hope the justice department pulls their collective heads out of their politically correct asses and finishes prosecuting the New Black panther Party members for voter intimidation.

We do need white sensitivity training in the country at this point. We sit every one down and make them repeat over and over. It is not white peoples fault that my life sucks, it’s my fault.  If we are going to indoctrinate people lets start by indoctrinating them with truth.

Until Next Time: Being white does not mean you owe anyone an apology!

Bookmark It

Nannystateitis ~ n. A disease of the progressive and activist organizations that makes them think that its ok to trample on the rights of the majority to punish  the bad behavior of the minority in order to protect “the greater good.”

The greater good -  now that truly is a reason to give up your rights isn’t it? The greater good is one of the tag lines that activist groups and nanny-state politicians use to invoke an emotional response so that they can pass increasingly intrusive legislation slowly stripping all of us of our rights. Unfortunately this is not a new concept and statements like “we need to pass this (insert intrusive legislation name here) in order to protect the greater good” or the ever popular “We must enact this law to protect the children.” Why do people keep falling for these untrue slogans and vote to strip themselves of their rights?

Please tell me you my loyal reader are not stupid enough to think that the government or any of these special interest groups give a damn about your safety or your children. These actions are purely to seize just that much more control of your lives and your actions. We see “feel good” laws and regulations pass and now have playgrounds around the country without slides or swings, or intruding on a business owner’s right to allow smoking in their establishment.

One of my favorite nanny-state lies is about the artificial sweetener saccharin those of you over thirty may remember this one. It started with a study in the late 1970s that showed saccharin contributed to bladder cancer in rats. So of course the nanny-state bureaucrats had to step up and pass all kinds of laws and restrictions. Warning labels had to be put on saccharin containing products and a lot of regulations on its uses were put into place. The only problem is that they didn’t tell you that the rats were subjected to levels of the sweetener that no human would ever come into contact with unless you drank 800 diet sodas a day. You know I’ll bet if you ate the amount of regular sugar in 800 sodas a day you would run a much higher risk of obesity and diabetes, so with that said lets pass laws that ban sugar too.

In the beginning I said that Nannystateitis is a progressive disorder and it is but do not mistake what I am saying. I do not use progressive to mean democrat because nanny stater’s are truly a bi partisan group that is not hampered by race, religion, sex or political affiliation. Nannystateitis is truly cross-cultural and it is part of every activist ideology and it occurs when oversensitive cry-babies get offended or someone gets hurt or killed.

Lets take this for example. The United States suffers 6,500 drownings or around 1 per 50,000 of population on average per year. I would like to point out that is 6500 people more than have died from saccharine caused cancer. So using nanny-state logic we should pass legislation against going into the water. So close all the swimming pools and beaches because 6500 out of 300,000,000 die on average from drowning, or we should ban bathtubs because around 75 children a year die in them, therefore they are a safety hazard. So we need this law and it needs to pass to “protect the children.” Are you all starting to get the point.

So after deciding that you as an individual are too stupid to make your own choices these activist groups and the government pass these laws not to protect you but more so to control you and your behavior.

Stand up and stop believing their crap and allowing them to continue to lie to you with their made up facts and skewed statistics or one day you may just wake up in an Orwellian nightmare that you can’t escape.

Bookmark It

I was flipping around the news agencies today and came across a story on the Huffington Post which is a decidedly left wing progressive blog. The story was titled “Censorship American-Style: Hide the US dead” by Mr. Dave Lindorff who is a veteran investigative journalist who has authored four books, the most recent book he has published is The Case for Impeachment (St. Martin’s, 2006). Mr. Lindorffs’ stories have appeared in such diverse publications as The Nation, Mother Jones, Business week, Treasury & Risk, Rolling Stone and Salon.

I will get back to his story in a minute but first lets look at the background of the story Mr. Lindorff is referring to. The Associated Press released a controversial photo of an American Soldier Lance Cpl. Joshua Bernard in his last moments of life after being mortally wounded in an ambush in the Helmand Province of Afghanistan.  While this is definitely part of war, is it really appropriate to plaster pictures of these brave men and women in a broken state at the end of their lives? Are people really that morbid or do the Anti-war and Anti-military kooks just want to use these images and put these soldiers’ families through extra unnecessary grief to push their agenda?

Now on to Mr. Lindorffs’ article on this subject. First he states that “The Obama administrations freak out” over the Associated Press’s release of the photo in question (which I will not post) is an example of the hypocrisy of US Authorities who stated the reason for their disapproval was based on protection of the families of these fallen heroes. Mr. Lindorff asserts that it is not the case at all but merely a ruse used to censor the horror of war from the eyes of the American people. In his article he makes the point that it has just been in the last 18 years that journalists have not shown pictures of our fallen. While it is true that as far back as the battle of Antietam they did show pictures of the field of battle after the fact, showing the fallen warriors and this practice did continue through the Vietnam war. Does it really serve the interests of any party anti- or pro- war to show images and cause extra distress to the families of either side, our enemies or our own. While Lindorff’s article states that Gates said that it was “insensitive” to Lance Cpl. Bernard’s family, what he conveniently  left out, is that the family of Lance Cpl. Bernard called associated press and repeatedly asked them not to release the images of their dying son.

It is an absolute amazement to me that the parents of this example of America’s best had to repeatedly ask the AP not to publish the photo and yet they did it anyway. But when senator Kennedy’s family put in a polite request that they go dark at one point during his funeral and the news agencies eagerly complied. Why does the family of a  man that fought and died to ensure that the privileges that we have taken for granted are not lost, have their pleas ignored, and a man that sat in chair for 40 years get instant consideration? This is just disgusting!

And yet the Progressive Left seems to think that consideration is only for the rich and politically connected and not the ones that truly deserve it. The brave men and women that sit in the middle of those God forsaken deserts putting their lives on the line every day fighting so that the pompous, elitist politicians and news agencies can ignore the basic request of a grieving family how is that in any way OK.

Bookmark It