The White Male Oppressor Speaks

When I first found this video I didn’t think much of it. It just sounded like someone leading some students in a chant to reinforce that they could be anything they wanted when they grew up. Whats wrong with that?

Then I listened a little closer and while for the most part this was a positive exercise there were a few lines in there that rather disturbed me. The disturbing part of this is that amongst the standard “I can be anything” mantra these children are chanting they threw in a little indoctrination for good measure with having the children repeatedly say “I am an Obama Scholar.” Whats wrong with that you may be asking? It is quite simple. During an attempt at any socialist or communistic rise ever, the first place to start indoctination is the schools.

Now I am not saying that Obama is working to make himself a dictator because there is no actual proof of that, and I don’t want to make any potentially damaging comments about anyone without proof (unlike liberals). But what I am saying is you leak in  “glorious leader” mantras and indoctrination subtly at first to really drill it in before going full boar on the whole of the brainwashing. This is absolutely right out of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. If you haven’t read it I would suggest that you do and then watch the news, you will get a whole new disgust for these people. The Progressives are making it happen and the bulk of people are either to uninformed to see it or to apathetic to care.

So here is the video that I am talking about:

Just in case you could not understand what was being said here is the chant “Anything, anything, anything, anything I want to be I want, doctor, lawyer, judge, journalist, writer, fire fighter, principal, President, President, President, anything, anything, I want to be. If my mind can conceive it and my heart can believe it, then I know, I know, I know, I can achieve it, because I am an Obama scholar, an Obama scholar and I will strive to be, out outstanding, brilliant, I will achieve, I’ll be motivated, positive attitude, positive attitude, mountain, move out of my way.” This would be disturbing  enough if this was the only time. Besides what the hell does “I am an Obama Scholar have to do with any of the rest of it. This kind of crap happens in other schools as well. For example here is another video of more President Obama chants:

This one is even harder to understand so here is what these children are told to sing

Mm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

He said that all must lend a hand
To make this country strong again
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

He said we must be fair today
Equal work means equal pay
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

He said that we must take a stand
To make sure everyone gets a chance
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

He said red, yellow, black or white
All are equal in his sight
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

Yes!
Mmm, mmm, mm
Barack Hussein Obama

Some of these kids may not be able to spell indoctrination but they sure are victims of it.

Until Next Time: Courage

Bookmark It

I recently read a story from the guardian  entitled “Feminist books for five-year-olds” which describes a woman named Viv Groskop who apparently has a big problem with anything masculine.

So let the gender indoctrination begin. In Ms. Groskop’s article she tries to point out that boys and girls are different. (Wait,what, Really?) She starts off by saying what really started this off was the fact that her 6 year old son didn’t want any girls at his birthday party because in the boys words “Girls are boring.” Well yeah let’s look at that, he is a six year old boy lady to him girls still have cooties. I am sorry to be the one to have to tell you and the other feminazis out there but that is a normal reaction from a boy his age and he is not and I repeat is not being sexist. What this womanist seems to be forgetting is all the psychological studies done by PHD’s and Doctors of Psychology which clearly shows that gender identity is not something that is taught to you by children’s books or gender centric indoctrination. We will get more into the Psychology of gender development in a bit but first…

In Ms. Groskop’s description of her ideology which in my opinion is going to do nothing but damage her son as he grows up.  In the second paragraph of her article she states, “Will has enjoyed baking cakes, Vera has pretended to be Luke Skywalker. But the older they get, the harder it is to resist the pink-and-blue divide.” She says that as though gender identity is a wholly learned behavior as though there is no natural hormone driven separation between boys and girls gender development. If this was true, then by that logic a boy who is raised by a single mother from the time of infancy would grow up only liking Barbie and would surely feel completely comfortable wearing dresses and would by default grow up to be gay.  Or a girl who has was raised her whole life by a single father without the feminine influence of a mother would most certainly only like G.I. Joe and Monster trucks. However time and time again that logic is not only proven incorrect but is downright foolish.

Her extremely female centered ideology can also clearly be seen when she describes her story time reading when she was a nanny. She stated, “I found myself editing the words so as not to pass on a sexist message,” she goes on to say, “In most children’s books the girls have pretty frocks and bows in their hair, so I would turn it around – call the boys by girls’ names and vice versa.” This is absolutely absurd. She is in her own words stating that because the children’s books that the parents i.e. her employers bought for their children didn’t fit into her personal ideology she took it upon herself to try to indoctrinate someone else’s children with her unfortunate view of the world that appears to be girls should be boys and boys should be girls. Being as I do not have a degree in psychology I personally can’t speak to her true ideology or psychological state, but the evidence seems to point to personal  issues relating to gender superiority or at the very least an extremely skewed idea of gender roles between boys and girls. What I mean by that last statement is that she may see one gender – specifically the female gender as superior to that of the male gender which may  be the reason for trying so hard to skew her children’s ideas of gender rolls. Which has the potential to  cause  confusion in the child due to the fact that in society they see identifiable separate gender activities but at home they are being taught a gender superiority idea.

Since at this point I am sure some feminazi is thinking “Oh yeah prove that gender identity is not a wholly taught idea.” Okay, I will. First let us take a look at “Kohlberg’s Theory of Gender Identity.”  In 1966 Kohlberg put forth that there are three stages of gender development in children. The basics of this are stated as follows: “The first stage is gender identity, which is usually reached by the age of 2 years.  At this stage the child is able to correctly label its own sex.  The second stage is gender stability, which is usually reached by the age of 4 years.  At this stage the child realizes that gender remains the same across time.  However, its understanding of gender is heavily influenced by external features like hair and clothing.  A boy at this stage might say that if he put a dress on he would be a girl.  It is not until the third stage, gender constancy, that the child starts to understand that gender is independent of external features.  This stage is usually reached by the age of 7 years.” Mental note, her son is 6 or stage three and her daughter is 3 or stage two. Hmmm wonder which one is more susceptible to gender programming based on Kohlbergs assertion.

As stated above, observation of gender specific activities do play a roll in the identity development of children. Let’s look further at what this anti-princess is doing. I call her an anti-princess because she seems to thinks highly of the anti-princess reading list. Which were pioneered by the websites Mommytracked.com and Bitchmagazine.org. Plus I highly doubt she, on the absolutely remote chance she will ever read the White male oppressor would find that an insult. She states “So Pippi seems a good place to start. But can a three-year-old girl who wants to marry her daddy, and a six-year-old boy who hates pink, really be radicalised in just five easy reads? Time to find out . . .” which she follows by  reading the following books to her children and then putting their reactions in her article.

First we have the ever popular Pippy Longstocking. If any of you out there are actually unsure of what it is about, here is a short description: “Pippi’s mother dies on the first page and her father is lost at sea. Oh dear. But left to her own devices, Pippy goes on adventures, tells tall stories and is super-humanly strong.” I remember this story from my youth and personally do not have a problem with it. I think that it is a fun story for both boys and girls.

The next book on this girl power reading list is Girls are not Chicks: Coloring book. I went to Amazon.com to look through this book and wow. The first picture to be colored is a girl in a ballerina outfit holding a wrench reciting what I think are ballet terms while on her way to mechanic class. Yeah I kinda scratched my head too.

Next we have a book that I do absolutely have a problem with. Princess Smartypants which is about a woman who did not want to get married.  The character in the book keeps giant slugs as pets and challenges her prince suitors to roller-disco marathons. When one of them finally wins her over she intentionally turns him into a toad by kissing him and when the other princes hear what  happened to Prince Swashbuckle, none of them wanted to marry Smartypants, and she lived happily ever after. Yeah that’s a good wholesome message. If someone wins you over don’t love them, destroy them.

Well, you get the idea. While I would absolutely love to post the picture of this woman reading to her children because the body language is absolutely great, I didn’t want to get sued for not having permission to use a picture of her children, however if you want to see the pic. click on the first hyper-link of this article. Her son seems to be really uninterested in the book while her daughter seems enthralled with it big surprise she is reading a book called Pirate Girl to her kids which is about a girl named Molly who sets of in her boat on holiday to her granny’s, when she is kidnapped by Captain Firebeard and his vicious band of pirates. However Molly’s mother is Barbarous Bertha and when she comes to rescue her daughter she brings her own female pirate crew.  At the end the male pirates are forced to polish Barbarous Bertha’s boots 14 times a week. Yeah beat down those evil men! Once again a fantastically wholesome message for a children’s book.

The point is: quit with the misandristic childrens books, quit trying to force your children into a potentially confusing idea. Do you honestly think that a three year old girl has the reasoning capacity to understand complex gender identity issues? And do you honestly think that pushing a femcentric ideology on a 6 year old boy is going to make him sensitive to the imagined oppression of women (Muslim countries excluded) or do you think it is going to maybe cause him anger and confusion having consistently being told through these stories that boys are either bad or unnecessary. Use your head or start shopping for a psychiatrist now because it’s going to get really expensive for you.

Bookmark It