The White Male Oppressor Speaks

Good day my friends. I am sure that you are all familiar with the old biblical adage “The meek shall inherit the earth”. This phrase seems be a more and more common battle-cry of Liberalism in America and entitlement protests throughout the world like in Greece and France just to name a couple. But would the meek really inherit anything if they had to pull themselves up and work for it? I think not. Indulge me while I explain my reasoning behind this in a little more detail. To do so first we must understand what the word meek means. Meek is defined as “overly submissive or compliant; spiritless; tame.”

I am sure that most if not all of you reading this know at least one person that fits the above description. I want you to think about that person for a moment. If it were not for the generosity of others whether freely given or forced through taxation, would that person inherit anything? Or would they die begging for what they are not willing to obtain through their own means? If suddenly one day the government said “that is it, no more”. Would they start busting their ass to support themselves and families? Or would they come to you palms outstretched looking for a handout? Remember these are the same people that beg for larger government involvement and taxation. They gladly surrender their rights not even for a piece of bread but for the mere promise of a crumb of that bread. They then pick up signs and chant slogans and riot to try to convince the rest of us to agree that their handouts are a valid necessity. These are the same people that scream for socialism or communism in the spirit of fairness. Fairness being you work hard and have accumulated too much and need to give that which you worked for away to those that would not. And anyone who has picked up a history book or does not blindly accept” bumper sticker” propaganda slogans knows socialism and communism do not work. Don’t believe me Google up a little bit of Ukrainian history during Soviet communism.

Before you right me off as a “far right winger”, I must say I strongly believe in helping the helpless. On the other side of that coin I also strongly believe that the clueless are not in that number and are not deserving of help from those that work hard, and I sure as hell don’t believe that the government has either the capacity nor ability to help the helpless in any meaningful way. Let private charities do this work, that is what they are good at. Whether or not you are of a more “left” or “right” leaning of the political and social persuasion, or whether or not you agree or disagree with social programs. Do you like the idea that large numbers of  the so called meek get a free pass on laziness paid for by you without your consent? Ultimately and completely the meek shall inherit nothing. That is unless that which they inherit you consent to have taken from you by force or legislation. But I fear that our society has grown to apathetic to hard work and personal responsibility to stand up and say enough is enough. The other option, the one that seems to be easier and more politically and socially correct is that you can just sit back and accept an ever growing entitlement complex or take a firmer grip on our society.

Until Next Time: Courage

Share The Oppression

Here is to the NAACP LA Chapter for adding one to the “I hear what I want to file”. Members of the Las Angeles NAACP chapter are raising a ruckus towards Hallmark because they, of course, hear racial epithets where none exist. Here is the situation, Hallmark releases a new graduation card featuring Boots and Yoyo with a solar system theme that has a micro speaker that says the following “Hey world we are officially putting you on notice! You black holes you’re so ominous and you planets watch your back.”

But of course the race baiters at the LA chapter of the NAACP, as usual hear what they want to hear rather than what is actually being said. The President of the LA chapter Leon Jenkins who apparently was not getting enough attention claims that the card actually says “You black whores you’re so ominous“.  Now not having experience with black whores or any whores for that matter I could not attest to how ominous they can be but one thing is for sure this guy needs to get a hearing test. What is worse is that he has all kinds of black people who, I would assume, are otherwise intelligent people believing that the dastardly denizens of hate “HALLMARK” are intentionally putting a slight against the black race in their otherwise fun graduation cards.

I can just see that meeting at Hallmark, cant you? All of those evil Hallmark execs sitting around in white sheets scheming on ways to insult black people through their series of playful and well known greeting cards and let us not forget they have to come up with a fake script to release to the press. Anyone who actually buys into this is a sheep and will do and believe anything they are told. Unfortunately stores have bowed to this race card playing buffoon and are pulling the card from their shelves because someone got their feelings hurt by a non-existent insult.

I have listened to this card over and over trying my hardest to hear either the word Whore or Ho as some have said but for the life of me all I can hear is black hole. I guess I am just either to racist or to blind to the eminent threat that Hallmark poses to the black culture to hear it.

The point is crap like this has gone too far. For crap sake quit trying to read an insult into everything you come across. It makes you (and I am looking at you LA chapter of the NAACP) look foolish. I know that the only way you make money is to make people think that they are much bigger victims than they actually are but this is just ridiculous.

Until Next Time: Courage

Share The Oppression

I have been noticing a rather interesting if not wildly amusing trend on various message boards and blogs. It appears as though after almost 50 years of the second wave feminist movement women are still not happy with the result. For the last half century from the time of the first bra burning to the latest penile dismemberment the feminist idea and rhetoric of  “We can do whatever a man can”  has been propagated throughout our society and brow beat into every school girl and women’s studies major. Now it appears all that hard work and misandry is now making some of them unhappy. I say that because I see over and over in article after article and blogs aplenty the same women who scream from the roof tops about equality and gender neutrality complaining that Chivalry is dead and that men do not know how to treat a lady anymore.

Well princess guess who is really to blame for chivalries demise. That would be you. Chivalry is not dead it is just in its death throws. Not because of some secret meeting and memo that went out to all men in the united states, the postage alone on that would be a killer. Chivalries death rattle is because women keep stabbing it in the heart repeatedly by taking offense at the very things they claim men do not do enough of.

A prime example of a perceived crime against femininity is holding the door open for a women. While this practice was universally accepted as a courtesy before the current wave of misandristic feminism, it is now an offence worthy of public humiliation. For example I myself the loveable White Male Oppressor has stopped holding the door open for any woman who is below the age of social security because there have been several times where I would be walking and a woman would be behind me so I would do as I was taught growing up and hold the door open for her and receive a sometimes banshee level scolding of “I do not need a damn man to hold the door for me” or “Jesus when are we ever going to be treated like equals.” So congratulations you have succeeded. You have successfully trained one more man that to be courteous is to be a misogynist.

The current generation is being taught by the children of the feminist hay day of hippie bra burnings and male degradation. These mothers never taught their sons chivalrous courtesies and gave their daughters a victim complex masked as a superiority complex. This has been done to the point that if a man tries to be nice he should be kicked in the balls. Why because women have been indoctrinated to believe that the only possible reason a man would be polite is because he wants to have sex with you. So now the current generation of boys and girls are being taught not to trust each other because of the mindset that they just want to use you. The last 50 years of this crap has just been leading to a gender war the likes of which Valerie Solanas could not have imagined. One where parents no longer teach their children respect for the other gender fostering mistrust and outright hostility.

Some of the biggest perpetrators and purveyors of this are groups like the National Organization of Women who do a excellent job of portraying women as absolute victims of a perceived phallocracy and pump millions of dollars a year into getting destructive misandristic legislation passed. Is there anyone left that is so naive to think that these groups do this out of the kindness of their hearts or a love of women? Sadly yes but the truth is these groups have millions of reasons in the bank why they need to push this idea and lead the sheepets in to victim hood.

The only way that these groups can keep the coffers overflowing is to teach women that they are victims of men. They need to push the idea that men do nothing as a courtesy and that there is always an ulterior motive laying just below the zipper. The point is if you want to be treated like a lady then act like one. Stop believing the rhetoric from these activist groups. Stop berating a man for holding the door open for you and above all else if you want men to be chivalrous it is incumbent on you to teach your children to be so. You have already destroyed chivalry in your children and if you truly want that changed you will have to teach your adult children how to be chivalrous and ensure your grand children are taught the same. Until you are willing to do that you better get a nose guard because that door is going to hit you in the face more and more often.

Until Next Time: Courage

Share The Oppression

I had originally posted this some time ago but almost lost it in a database fry. This is still relevent and I feel strongly about looking deeper into people that I am told I have to look up to before I give them the benefit of the doubt. Because more often than not these individuals do not deserve the adulation that is heaped upon them by the masses. So without further ado. Here’s Gandhi.

A lot of people out there are going to probably be upset by this, but Mahatma Gandhi was not the master of peace and pacifistic ideology that we have been mislead to believe. The truth as often is the case, is in great contrast to the myth. So I think that I will examine the truth that you are not told about this supposed man of the people and of peace.

First a little background on this man that so many look up to. From his biography on mkgahndi.com here is his humble beginnings. “MOHANDAS KARAMCHAND GANDHI was born on October 2, 1869, at Porbandar, a small town on the western coast of India, which was then one of the many tiny states in Kathiawar. He was born in middle class family of Vaishya caste. His grandfather had risen to be the Dewan or Prime Minister of Porbandar and was succeeded by his son Karamchand who was the father of Mohandas. Putlibai, Mohandas’s mother, was a saintly character, gentle and devout, and left a deep impress on her son’s mind.

While he was still in high school, he was married, at the age of thirteen, to Kasturbai who was also of the same age. For a boy of that age marriage meant only a round of feasts, new clothes to wear and a strange and docile companion to play with. But he soon felt the impact of sex which he has described for us with admirable candour. The infinite tenderness and respect which were so marked a characteristic of his attitude in later life to Indian women may have owed something to his personal experience of “the cruel custom of child marriage”, as he called it.

Now that you have a basic beginning point let us continue. When the Boer war broke out Gandhi formed with the help of Dr. Booth the Indian Ambulance Corps which consisted of 1100 volunteers and offered its services to the Crown. It is said that he encouraged the Indian people in South Africa to do this because they claimed their rights under the British so it was their duty to Britain.

Later on in his life, Gandhi started a newspaper called the Indian Opinion and made different speeches, where we see the true face of Mahatma Gandhi emerged. Gandhi addressed a public meeting in Bombay on 26 September 1896 he states the following: “Ours is one continued struggle against degradation sought to be inflicted upon us by the European, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw Kaffir, whose occupation is hunting and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with, and then pass his life in indolence and nakedness.” Just to help put his views in perspective the work Kaffir has a word in the English language that means the same thing, That word is Nigger.

Denegrating an entire group of people based soley on their ethnicty may be a little bit understandable because of the time period and could even be potentially overlooked if it were an isolated occurrence from the supposed great master of peace. But it was a running theme with him. Another example of this is an excerpt from his newspaper the Indian Opinion on September 9, 1905 where he is referring to the Black African native as follows: “Now let us turn our attention to another and entirely unrepresented community – the Indian. He is in striking contrast with the native. While the native has been of little benefit to the State, it owes its prosperity largely to the Indians. While native loafers abound on every side, that species of humanity is almost unknown among Indians here.”

Gandhi who was born to the merchant cast had no love for the lower caste Indian. He considered them unclean as can be seen from his comments here: “You say that the magistrate’s decision is unsatisfactory because it would enable a person, however unclean, to travel by a tram, and that even the Kaffirs would be able to do so. But the magistrate’s decision is quite different. The Court declared that the Kaffirs have no legal right to travel by tram. And according to tram regulations, those in an unclean dress or in a drunken state are prohibited from boarding a tram. Thanks to the Court’s decision, only clean Indians or colored people other than Kaffirs, can now travel in the trams.”

In reality the only people that Gandhi wanted to help were the upper caste Indians who he worked to get on the same level as white people in South Africa. He also believed that white British being the predominant race in South Africa was the best choice for that country. Gandhi was also all for segregation against the native black population out of Indian areas as seen by the following quote From the Indian Opinion of February 15, 1905; “Why, of all places in Johannesburg, the Indian location should be chosen for dumping down all Kaffirs of the town, passes my comprehension. Of course, under my suggestion, the Town Council must withdraw the Kaffirs from the Location. About this mixing of the Kaffirs with the Indians I must confess I feel most strongly. I think it is very unfair to the Indian population, and it is an undue tax on even the proverbial patience of my countrymen.”

I could go on and on about this peace maker’s views on racial purity, segregation, and classist attitudes but I feel that my point has been made for now. People need to look into those that they consider great, humble people of peace because the truth often obscured or blatantly ignored by blind sheeple as to the true nature of a persons work can paint an unrealistic picture of those that are adored. Below are some links so you can start to do your own research and make an informed decision if you still feel this imperialist, racist man was actually a man of the people.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2419

http://www.sikhsundesh.net/gandhi.htm

http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/gandhi.html

http://www.zimbio.com/Ghandi+quotes/articles/20/Gandhi+racism+truth+behind+mask+Behold+Sergeant

Until Next Time: Courage

Share The Oppression

In order for us to set the proper context for this post it is important to give a little background on Mother Teresa the so called saint of Calcutta. Then I will discuss why I say  “so called saint”.  Mother Teresa was born Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu (pronounced Agnes Gongsa Boyoku) in Skopje, Macedonia, on August 26, 1910. At the age of eighteen she left  home  and joined the Sisters of Loreto, which is an Irish community of nuns with missions in India. After training for a few months with a convent  in Dublin, she was sent to work in India. Agnes Bojaxhiu took her vows to be  a nun on May 24, 1931. In 1948 she received permission from her superiors to leave the convent school she had taught at since 1931 and devoted herself to working with the poorest of the poor in the slums of Calcutta.  Mother Teresa received permission from the Vatican on October 7 1950 to start her own order, “The Missionaries of Charity”, whose primary task was to love and care for those people that no one else would. In 1965 the Society became an International Religious Family by a decree of Pope Paul VI.

Some of the awards that Mother Teresa received were: The Pope John XXIII Peace Prize (1971) and the Nehru Prize for her promotion of international peace and understanding (1972). She also received the Balzan Prize (1979), the Nobel Peace Prize (1979) and the Templeton and Magsaysay awards.

What most people know about the Missionaries of Charity came from a documentary about her Order from 1969,  the church, and mainstream media that refused any ideas from critics wasn’t worth following. Now on to the unpleasant truth behind the squalid conditions that these poor people suffered in under the care of this Order. I will be discussing accounts from volunteers of the Missionaries of Charity as well as a former sister of the Order including a documentary film maker/reporter both of  whom had seen first hand what life was actually like in these aptly named “homes for the dying”.

First I would like to bring to you a  man named Donal MacIntyre who is an investigative journalist. He went undercover as a volunteer in her “flagship home” in Kolkata, India.  His description as to what he saw is distressing at best. Here is his account of what he saw in this home for disabled boys and girls. “I worked undercover for a week in Mother Teresa’s flagship home for disabled boys and girls to record Mother Teresa’s Legacy, a special report for Five News broadcast earlier this month. I winced at the rough handling by some of the full-time staff and Missionary sisters. I saw children with their mouths gagged open to be given medicine, their hands flaying in distress, visible testimony to the pain they were in. Tiny babies were bound with cloths at feeding time. Rough hands wrenched heads into position for feeding. Some of the children retched and coughed as rushed staff crammed food into their mouths. Boys and girls were abandoned on open toilets for up to 20 minutes at a time. Slumped, untended, some dribbling, some sleeping, they were a pathetic sight. Their treatment was an affront to their dignity, and dangerously unhygienic.” The first time I read this I was absolutely sickened at the thought of children no matter where they live being treated in such an inhumane condition. Now if it were just this account alone I would hold a more skeptical view of the validity of these claims so I did some more digging and found out some other unfortunate tidbits of knowledge.

The following excerpts are from a story in free inquiry magazine called “Mother Teresa’s House of Illusions” by Susan Shields a former sister in the Missionaries of Charity “As a Missionary of Charity, I was assigned to record donations and write the thank-you letters. The money arrived at a frantic rate. The mail carrier often delivered the letters in sacks. We wrote receipts for checks of $50,000 and more on a regular basis. Sometimes a donor would call up and ask if we had received his check, expecting us to remember it readily because it was so large. How could we say that we could not recall it because we had received so many that were even larger?” In that same article she describes an obvious hypocrisy “Our Constitution forbade us to beg for more than we needed, but, when it came to begging, the millions of dollars accumulating in the bank were treated as if they did not exist.” In another part Ms. Shields describes the horribly unsafe and unsanitary practice in Haiti of the sisters reusing hypodermic needles until they were blunt in order to keep the spirit of poverty. When some of the volunteers offered to go and get more needles the sisters refused.  At one point the Missionaries of Charity had around $50 million in the bank, and yet they refused to offer the people that needed real help anything but dull needles and horrible living conditions.

This is absolutely unconscionable especially for those that purport to follow Christ’s teachings yet Mother Teresa seems to be obsessed with the suffering of others with comments like “We see Christ in the broken body, and we touch him and that touch is comes from that deep faith that Christ cannot deceive“, to me that appears to say she needed the decrepit state and suffering of others for her to be closer to Christ. I have a hard time believing this is what Christ meant in Matthew 19:14 when he said “But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.”

In conclusion I am sure some fundamentalists out there are going to say I am lying and that I just hate Catholics and want to discredit a great woman. This could not be farther from the truth. I had no opinion on Mother Teresa or the Missionaries of Charity other than what I heard from admirers and the news until I started looking into her and her order and read the first hand accounts corresponded with previous volunteers and saw photos of the conditions that these people lived in unnecessarily. Yet the blissfully uninformed seem to hold people like Agnes and others who walk around with undeserved adulation or sainthood as society looks the other way when it comes to the atrocities that they commit. If you find comfort, security or happiness in the memory and works of Mother Teresa and her order I am not out to change your mind or defame Catholicism in anyway but purely to inform people of the reality behind those society holds as caretakers of virtue.

Next on the chopping block of reality. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

Until Next time: Courage.

Share The Oppression

Big Surprise, a story about one of the most unfriendly uber banks in the U.S. next to Bank of America of course. That bank would be JP Morgan Chase. I know what you are thinking – Chase bank treating people like crap? the hell you say. But as hard as it is to believe, I am afraid so. This tale of woe revolves around a construction worker named Ikenna Njoku, a 28 year old man from Auburn, Washington, who made the horrible mistake of trying to cash a Chase issued check at a Chase bank branch, mistake #1.

It seems that Mr. Njoku had the unmitigated gall to purchase his own home and receive the first time home buyer credit on his income tax.  That was mistake #2. He also made the mistake of having said tax return electronically deposited into a Chase bank account, mistake #3. He was planning on using the tax return to pay off his car but being as he had some financial issues earlier he had overdrawn his account and Chase closed it. Which is a reasonable response to overdrawn accounts and not why they suck.

When good ole Uncle Sam deposited his refund check, which amounted to a little over $9000 thanks to the home buyer credit, Chase took the $600 out that he owed them and then cut and mailed him a check for the rest. That sounds fair right?

Here is where our story takes a twist. While you can get a check for what you are owed from Chase let’s see what happens when you try to cash said check at Chase.When Mr. Njoku showed up to cash this check he was greeted with all the warmth and customer service one would expect. He was arrested. But perhaps I am getting a little ahead of myself. It is important to remember the check had his name and address on it and was issued by JP Morgan Chase to him. However and rightfully so the Chase Customer Banker who handles large checks at the Auburn branch was immediately suspicious of Mr. Njoku trying to cash a check at their bank. Mr. Njoku recounts the encounter “She asked me what I did for a living. Asked me where I got the check from, looked me up and down—like ‘you just bought a house in Auburn, really?’ She didn’t believe that,”. The Customer Banker said the check looked fake. So she, just to be sure this was on the up and up took the check, along with his drivers license and credit card, and called Bank Support. After standing their for around 15 minutes he informed them that he had to run an important errand and left. By the time he returned the bank was closed for the day.

Mr. Njoku that evening called the JP Morgan Chase customer no-service hot-line and was told that he could return the next day to claim his check, license and credit card. When he arrived at the bank the next day it was not the money and what shreds of dignity he had left that were waiting for him but the Auburn police who arrested him for check fraud (a felony) and subsequently locked him up on June 24 2010 which was a Thursday. Being confused by the situation Mr. Njoku exclaimed as he was being arrested “you’re making a mistake, you’re making a mistake, don’t take me to jail, I got work tomorrow. I can’t afford to miss work.” The following day Chase realized its mistake and called the detective who was handling the case to let them know it was a mistake. But being as it was the detectives day off just left a message and called it good. Because as we all know police departments don’t have 24 hr 7 day a week phone numbers in case of a situation. Strike that, I am sure they all have 24 hr hot-lines in case of “The Situation.” sorry bad joke back to our story. As it turns out they do or so says Auburn Police Commander Dave Colglazier who said “Chase could have done a lot more to let them know they’d locked up an innocent man .” followed by “We do have a main line that comes into our front office. There are ways to reach someone 24/7 at a police department.” So Njoku spent the entire weekend in jail.

Being as he sat in jail for 5 days you would think the bank would just apologize and cash his check.  Not exactly what really happened was that he lost his job for not showing up for work and his check was confiscated as evidence which took till August of 2010 for him to recieve. In the mean time since his car was towed from the bank parking lot and he had no job and no check he was unable to pay the towing fines and fees before his car was sold at auction.  For an inconvenience this big you would expect maybe a xeroxed, apology form letter. That would at least be an acknowledgment of oops on their part. Sadly not, But what they did do is out right ignore him with all their collective might for over a year.

Then an attorney decided to take up Mr. Njoku’s case and wrote a strongly worded letter to JP Morgan Chase. Finally after OVER a year on June 30th 2011 Chase apologized for the mishap. As seen here by what Darcy Donahoe-Wilmot of Chase Public Relations wrote. “We apologize to Mr. Njoku and deeply regret what happened to him. We are working quickly to understand all the details so we can reach a fair resolution.” Right I am sure they are.

And the moral of the story is, If you like your job and you like your car don’t cash a check a JP Morgan Chase.

Until Next Time: Courage

Share The Oppression