The White Male Oppressor Speaks

We are victims hear us roar in numbers to big to ignore. No matter how much we would like to ignore them, NOW (National Organization of Women) are at it again making over the top assumptions in their media hall of shame claiming that a new ad campaign by Burger King promotes shower stalking. Just a thought but you don’t hear about shower stalking too much outside of adult websites. What’s their research material. Here is a screenshot for your enjoyment, I mean abject horror. Notice the strategic burger placement.

Isn’t that just a sickening thought ladies? You are just standing there enjoying a shower in your hamburger bikini and some sicko sneaks in with a webcam and starts filming you showering and singing “I think we’re alone now” for a burger commercial (shutter).  The horror this poor woman must have gone through, I just can’t imagine. Oh the degradation and objectification (yes feminists like to use big words) of this poor woman. I had to watch it 12 or 13 times before I truly understood the horrible act that is happening here. I may just for the sake of truly understanding the plight of the showering women in hamburger bikinis  have to watch it again. And so can you right here Burger King Shower Babe.

As the action item analasys goes on the bra burning anger increases with such things as accusing Burger King of borderline promoting illegal activities like oh shower stalking. They also compare this to the Erin Andrews peep hole incident. Not quite the same thing but I guess if you are going to go out on a limb to make a point might as well go as far out as possible. I mean seriously. While this marketing ploy at worst might be in bad taste unless you have an unrealistic, anger based overly biased agenda, you can hardly say this is promoting stalking.

What I find humorous is that while the National Organization for Women being a decidedly leftist group seems to give other extreme leftist groups a pass for example: where is their complaints about PETA and their “Pornography for Animal Rights”  adds? One of PETAs recent adds that has Alicia Silverstone bare naked (See it Here You are welcome) is conveniently overlooked by these women who are so quick to call any corporation or conservative sexist or make objectification of women accusations at the drop of a hat. I guess it is ok to treat women as objects as long as you are trying to make a point rather than sell a product to a specific demographic.

I say good for you Burger King, keep it up and maybe just maybe they will whine enough that more people will see your advertisement and ultimately give a greater return on your advertising investment. Objectify away my friends millions of lonely men are depending on you.

Bookmark It

The overwhelming desire to truly achieve the proper perception of victimization takes a lot of work, right ladies? At least that seems to be the case for women who want to eviscerate Barbie and send My Little Pony to the glue factory because they aren’t masculine enough for our nation’s little girls.

I came across this story on one of my favorite sites for exaggerated misandristic tendencies, Feministing.org which shows little girls playing with carpentry sets and FBI costumes. I think that it is great to show little girls playing with these kinds of toys. I myself have told my daughter not to rule out trade jobs because you can make a comfortable living at them. However feminists seem to think that that is not enough and from the different articles I have read will not be happy until we have a whole generation on Diesel Tykes who have not one shred of femininity left in them. Below you see the pictures that are an affront to feminism:

Those are some of the actual pictures that these womanists are complaining about. What do they have to complain about you might ask? The reason that they are all butt hurt is not over the fact that they are playing with traditionally boy oriented toys but by what these young ladies are wearing. That’s right because they are wearing pink and purple the Feminazis are whining that the advertisers are still being sexist. Because as we all know little girls don’t really like pink and purple its just a stereotype drilled into them by the evil Phallacrocy. I guess little girls are supposed to be wearing combat boots and camo with butch haircuts to be seen as appropriately de-feminized to debunk the so called stereotyping. Like I said above Diesel Tykes.

Not only that but the complaint continues on that the offending toy seller Toystogrowon.com does not have little boys playing with traditionally girl toys like Easy-bake ovens, dress-up mirrors, tea time trolley, or fashion studio. I wonder why they wouldn’t market these things to boys. Perhaps it is because and this is a guess but unless a boy is being raised / damaged by a raging feminist we as boys don’t gravitate to those toys naturally. I think that toys to grow on is a great site and I will be looking there for toys for my daughters.

Oh but wait it gets better; apparently another big thorn in the collective hind end of the “matriarchal revolution” is a book that was also mentioned called the “Dangerous book for boys” which as described on the product page says:
“The bestselling book for every boy from eight to eighty, covering essential boyhood skills such as building tree houses, learning how to fish, finding true north, and even answering the age old question of what the big deal with girls is. In this digital age there is still a place for knots, skimming stones and stories of incredible courage. This book recaptures Sunday afternoons, stimulates curiosity, and makes for great father-son activities. The brothers Conn and Hal have put together a wonderful collection of all things that make being young or young at heart fun—building go-carts and electromagnets, identifying insects and spiders.”

Apparently it is not okay for there to be a book for boys in fem-land but guess what sweetheart, there is. It is also interesting to point out that they failed to mention a companion book called “The Daring Book For Girls“, Which has the description of: “The Daring Book for Girls is the manual for everything that girls need to know—and that doesn’t mean sewing buttonholes! Whether it’s female heroes in history, secret note-passing skills, science projects, friendship bracelets, double dutch, cats cradle, the perfect cartwheel or the eternal mystery of what boys are thinking, this book has it all. But it’s not just a guide to giggling at sleepovers—although that’s included, of course! Whether readers consider themselves tomboys, girly-girls, or a little bit of both, this book is every girl’s invitation to adventure.”

So by not mentioning that there is  a similar book for girls tells me that in their minds it is okay for there to be a book geared towards girls but not for those evil future oppressors you know of as boys.

On a side note I looked at a lot of the bios for these women that write this crap and surprisingly in their pictures there weren’t very many of them wearing wedding rings. Hmmm wonder why.

Bookmark It

Ok so I am sure the comments will start rolling about how stereotyping is bad and that not all women drivers are like this. Well that is not the point. Stereotyping is not bad it saves time so here we go. here are the best of the worst women drivers from around the net so lets start off with…

“I thought I took it out of the tank.”

And next “That wall looks like a good place to park”

This one I just have no fragin clue how she accomplished this..

Someone needs to learn how to put on her helmet…

Not even trained police women are immune to their driving stereotypes…

Sorry lady thats not the propper way to catch a train…

Learning to drive?

And one last one for all of you out there. All she wanted was to go on a boat ride

Bookmark It